- Nov, 07 的存檔:

Harm Reduction Guide to Coming Off Psychiatric Drugs

寫得很好的一個冊子,由一位13 年沒需要再吃藥的精神分裂病患撰寫,18 個比威爾斯、瑪麗醫院的教授們更懂得接受現實的醫藥專家顧問,大概總勝過我在此又喊又嗌勞氣頓足一百幾十遍。作者在自序中提到,這正是自己很多年前開始接受精神科治療就希望讀到、應該讀到的一個手冊。如果你關心,如果你自己、或家人朋友正在服食精神科藥物,請下載讀一讀。如果你英文還可以,請和我一起把它翻譯過來。

冊子以「減害」為前提,並且援引多年來的精神科受害者權益運動的成果,扼要指出精神科與醫藥業神話般的「科學真相」的謬誤和利益體系、執業者在其建制位置上的無能無知、病人在管理主義式的「治療」中受到的疏忽照顧、其他治療方案之長久被排斥等等癥結;精神科藥物介入因而由其中一種 處理急症的緩衝措施,置換成唯一一種無了期的慢性殘害,蔑視人的自然治癒能力,標籤與對病况的疑慮和恐惧,窒礙了病人成長、自顧能力與支援網絡的發展,苦困於長期服藥、長期病患的孤獨境況….. 更重要的是,作者把各種批判精神科的研究和過來人的心得,綜合寫成一般人讀得懂的實用手冊。減害,增益,就是要把這個扭作一團的問題狀況分析開來,逐步剔走那些窒礙著自然治療能力生效的條件因素、教育自己可能遇到的斷癮症狀,把精神科藥物治療看成其中一種方案、而非唯一方案。

知識增權,知識就是力量,問題是誰的知識、誰的權力。這個手冊的要旨其實就是一條:informed consent。只有在充份理解下方可判斷是否同意採取某項治療措施,這正是我們的醫療系統未許給予的,可卻是我們的基本人權,我們沒理由不知道自己每天把甚麼吃進肚裡。

IMPORTANT: the symptoms of psychiatric drugs withdrawal can sometimes look exactly like the “mental illness” that the medications were prescribed for in the first place.

People can become “psychotic,” anxious, or any other psychiatric symptom from drug withdrawal itself, not because of their psychiatric “disorder” or condition.

When someone goes off a psychiatric drug they can have anxiety, mania, panic, depression and other painful symptoms. These may be the same, or even worse, than what got called psychosis or mental disorder before the drug was taken. Typically people are then told that this proves their illness has come back and they therefore need the drug. However, it may be the withdrawal effect from the drug that is causing these symptoms.

Withdrawal symptoms do not necessarily prove you need a psychiatric drug any more than headaches after you stop drinking coffee prove you need caffeine, or delirium after stopping alcohol shows you need to drink alcohol. It just means your brain has become dependent on the drug, and needs time to adjust to being off it. Psychiatric drugs are not like insulin for a diabetic: they are a tool or coping mechanism.

Scientists used to believe that the brain could not grow new cells or heal itself, but this is now known to be untrue. Everyone can heal. A strong and healthy body with good lifestyle and positive outlook will help support and nurture your brain and body to heal. When you have been on psych drugs for years, it can however sometimes take years to successfully reduce or go off them. Many people on these drugs, especially long-term neuroleptic anti-psychotics, develop brain injury and damage. This may not be permanent, but sometimes people live the rest of their lives with these brain changes. You may find that the goal of going off completely might not be right for you. You may feel better staying on them, and decide instead to reduce your medication or stay at the same dosage, and focus on other ways to improve your life.

Will Hall. Harm Reduction Guide to Coming Off Psychiatric Drugs.

Icarus Project& the Freedom Center. 2007. p22

相關:

無以答辯/沒有人要寫信給精神病患 (1/2)

短片: Panorama: Seroxat- Secrets of the Drug Trials (BBC, 2005)

受害者網誌: seroxat secrets…

1 則留言 27 Nov, 07

書抄 #2

(…) People are bad, good, clever, stupid, pleasant and unpleasant; but superfluous… no. That’s to say, if you want to understand me: the universe could get along without such people… of course; but uselessness is not their chief quality, not their distinctive characteristic, and when you talk about them the word “superfluous” is not the first one that springs to one’s tongue. But in my case, nothing else can be said about me: I’m superfluous and that’s all there is to it. Redundant - nothing else. Nature did not count on my appearance and therefore treated me like an unexpected and unbidden guest. One joker has said of me not inappropriately, keen on cards as he was, that I was the throwaway card in my mother’s hand. I talk about myself now calmly, with no bitterness… The game’s long over! During the course of my life I constantly found my place already occupied, perhaps because I looked for it in the wrong place. I was highly strung, pitifully shy, extremely irritable, like all ill people; in addition, perhaps through excessive self-regard or generally through the unsuccessful structure of my personality, there existed between my feelings and my thoughts — and the expression of these feelings and thoughts — some senseless, incomprehensible and impregnable obstacles. And when I tried to overcome this obstacle by force, to smash this barrier, my movements, my facial expression, my whole being acquired a look of intense effort: I not only looked, but I actually became unnatural and over-wrought: I felt this myself and hastened to return to what I was. Then a frightful panic would arise in me. I used to analyse myself down to the last thread, used to compare myself with others, recalled all the smallest glances, smiles and words of those to whom I’d tried to be frank, interpreted everything in a bad light, laughed viciously at my attempts “to be like the rest” — and suddenly, in the midst of my laughing, I’d give way to sadness, fall into ludicrous despondency and once again start the whole process all over again — in short, I went round and round like a squirrel on a wheel. Whole days went by in this tormenting, fruitless activity. Well, now just you tell me, to whom and for what is such a man necessary? Who knows and who will say why this happened to me, what was the cause of this nitpicking concern with myself?

I remember I was once travelling away from Moscow in a diligence. The road was good, but the driver hitched up a fifth horse to the four already in harness. This unfortunate fifth horse, completely useless, tied somehow to the shaft by a short, stout rope which mercilessly cut its haunch, rubbed its tail and forced it to run in the most unnatural fashion, lending its whole body the shape of a comma, always aroused in me profound pity. I remarked to the driver that on this occasion one could get by without a fifth horse… He said nothing, shook his head, lashed the horse ten times with his whip across its thin back and distended stomach — and muttered, not without a grin: “Look, it’s dragged itself along right enough! Devil knows why, eh?

And I’ve dragged myself along just like that… though, thanks heavens, the post-station’s not far off now.

— Ivan Turgenev.

“The Diary of a Superfluous Man” First Love & Other Stories. Trans. Richard Freeborn. Oxford& NY: Oxford UP, 1989. pp33-34.

留言 25 Nov, 07

報事:懷念傅魯炳— 傅炳榮攝影作品展

在他眼底裡 - 從社會行動到民眾戲劇
fu-lo-bing.jpg

懷念傅魯炳

傅炳榮攝影作品展

傅魯炳(傅炳榮)為亞洲民眾戲劇節協會創辦成員之一。他是70年代雙週刊的主要成員,在七十年代開始參與社會運動,反資反殖反官僚。他曾是六四吧的酒保, 廣結四方豪傑,亦多次與亞洲民眾戲劇知名人士及行為藝術家合作。傅生前屢訪亞洲地區,以照片及錄像紀錄了亞洲民眾戲劇工作者的非凡靱力。

傅魯炳去世前幾年,他集中從事視覺紀錄工作,是次的相片,是他這幾年來,走訪不同的亞洲國家的作品。傅魯炳對這些國家人民生活有他的角度和看法,在相片 中,這些人民雖然貧窮,但充滿自信、能力和智慧去面對日常的生活;在戲劇演出方面,他以獨有角度和眼光發展出一套別樹一幟的紀錄手法。這次是傅魯炳部份攝 影作品的展覽,這些作品從未公開展出。

地點: 香港藝術中心3 樓實驗畫廊

日期: 二零零七年十一月十九日* 至十二月二日

*十一月十九日下午五時設有開幕酒會

時間: 早上十時至晚上六時;免費入場

查詢:2891 8482;9320 4938 莫仔;或電郵至 mokchai(at)hotmail(dot)com

主辦: 亞洲民眾戲劇節協會

全力支持:
社區文化發展中心

相關

懷念本土民眾劇場工作者傅老炳 (mininoise/老B )

哀!(李智良)

 

All in his eyes – From Social Action to People’s Theatre

Foo Bing Wing’s Photo Exhibition
- In memory of “Foo Lo Bing”

Foo was one of the founding members of Asian People’s Theatre Festival Society. Foo claimed himself as a people’s theatre worker. Foo Bing Wing was a member of the radical youth group 70s Biweekly and was involved actively in social protests movements including many anti-colonial activities since the 70s. He became a founding member of the Asian People’s Theatre Festival Society. He was the legendary barman at Club 64, great friend of many people’s theatre workers of different countries of Asia and performance artists of China.

During the last years before his death, Foo focused on visual documentary productions –photo and video records. Here are the photos taken by him when he visited different Asian countries. He used his camera and video to record the people’s theatre performances in these countries. In his photos, people were poor but full of self-confidence, ability and wisdom to face their daily life. For the performances, he presented the whole process with his own unique eyes and approaches. All these photos were part of Foo’s works not shown publicly hitherto.

Venue: Experimental Gallery, Hong Kong Arts Centre

Date: 19/11/2007* - 2/12/2007
* 19/11 An Opening Yellow Wine Party will be served at 5PM

Time: 10:00 AM - 6:00 PM

Free Admission

Enquiries:
2891 8482
9320 4938 Mokchai Mok
mokchai(at)hotmail(dot)com

Organized by:
Asian People’s Theatre Festival Society

Coorganized by:
Centre for Community Cultural Development

留言 21 Nov, 07

愛情路上的西環段

讓我說一些開心的事情!人兒與光。

por-macho_01pps.jpg

著名搖滾樂手阿波和成衣買手馬草結婚兩週年又找我拍照,壓力一年比一年大。去年兩口子跟媒人婆金小姐一行4 人到了方才建成的是非之地新天星碼頭和昂平360吊車拍照,發生了彩色菲林錯裝黑白濾鏡的災難。

por-macho_02pps.jpg

今年4/11,金小姐抱恙失約,我自己宿醉醒來遲到西邊街,在兩公婆的家裡吃過即食麵,到了即將因為地鐵延線而大幅炒起的西區街頭,名曰「走入群眾」實為3 名高齡人仕偕一無知少女當街溜躂取景,趕著午後的陽光一直向西走,在坡道上亂轉一輪,買花之餘又探訪了美沙酮診所的野貓,後徒步走到石塘咀、一直走到西環尾。像生活此處平凡的每個人一樣,用腳走出條路。

por-macho_03pps.jpg

持攝影機的人,惜高樓令電車路非常灰暗,有違阿波要拍「光與影」的出題,一心要向海邊走,過許多馬路,要向海邊走,當然没有找到天涯海角,只有一尺也買不起的新樓盤和快將報廢的舊樓、廠厦和小公園,還有在殮房後面、鐵柵外臨海垂釣的人。海面上是一幅晴天樓景,好難才找到一小塊天海連接啊。

另,同學Jay 沿途一直拿著去年留著的風車,行走在街上,轉轉轉轉轉,無視途人目光,非常迷幻,由於迷幻而掉失方向感,經常落入鏡頭視角,疑有攝位之嫌!

相關主題阿波馬草結婚2 週年影集 (未經photoshop 就出左街,成為既定事實。)

10 則留言 18 Nov, 07

總統看不見

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

昨日(11/11) 來自台大、東吳、輔大、成大的青年樂生聯盟成員向總統陳情,反對「一套文資,兩套標準」,要求「中正紀念堂指定古蹟,樂生院比照辦理」,行為雖然理性和平卻遭國安單位暴力對待

2 則留言 12 Nov, 07

轉貼:接火棒易,買得太遲

arthur_late.jpg

1 則留言 11 Nov, 07

Kunti Moktan: Man Ko Deuta

是這樣的,有一天晚上,塞著耳機在聽著從網上某些角落抓來的下載曲目,從頭到尾不知聽了多少遍,聽到這首就像年輕人一樣,重覆又重覆聽著同一首歌,重覆,同時深怕不久就要把它聽膩、聽厭了,然後還是一次一次按著重播的制,大概只是汽車和隣居太吵,深夜無眠,不是沉溺。

然後淚珠兒爬過臉上又滴落在枕頭上,其實是一句都聽吾明。
那麼,我算是學懂了一點尼泊爾語了,音韻是感情,還跟著副歌一齊唱。

雖然liam 一定會反對、或者引用弗洛依德理論嘲笑一番,我把它loop 著放,一起快些聽膩、聽厭它吧!

相關:Kunti Moktan 的其他曲目

留言 07 Nov, 07

報事:「中九龍幹線與你」公眾論壇

非常恐怖的計劃,剖開廟街,油蔴地警署、郵局等極可能拆去。如果一座朗豪坊整肅了砵蘭街,一條貫穿到西九龍的高速快線對油旺、佐敦的社區生態可以是怎樣的摧毁性衝擊?

irenecoverbanner_preview.jpg

[請廣傳] 各位朋友:

緊急﹗話說中九龍幹線2012才正式動工,但咨詢/研究就在今個月正式開始。
第一次公眾論壇將在下列時間舉行 :

「中九龍幹線與你」公眾論壇
日期:2007 年11 月10日 [今個星期六]
時間: 1330-1700
地點:油麻地梁顯利社區中心
現誠邀各界關注社區與香港城市規劃的朋友,報名出席這個論壇並參與發言。
(報名:2859 0101/ckr@meinhardt.com.hk)
(論壇詳細資料請參看宣傳海報。)

之前八樓一些朋友,上過立法會申訴部,也見過一次路政署,雖然「人民/街坊參與規劃」、「社區網絡與特色的維持」、「公共地方與市集的關係」 都在會上說盡,總算被約成 「社區影響」幾個字,擠了進去這工程堪察的項目裡頭。另外我們當時提出的「不以現時走線作唯一選擇或咨詢前提」更是沒有得到路政署甚至當區議員的理會…

現時,整個中九幹線計劃進入勘察階段,咨詢/研究卻由路政署外判給研究公司+香港大學城市規劃及環境研究中心負責。我們想來想去也對路政署總攬了關係到地政、規劃、路政、民政等各部門的研究,而且一切由路政主導,侊如天星皇后與P2 路的翻版,實不簡單。所以我們「廟街關注小組」希望召集各方朋友們,一同出席這個區內政客忙於區選競爭、而宣傳極少的 「公眾論壇」。

自年前得知中九龍幹線的興建計劃至今,其實政府做的各種有關幹線介紹的宣傳都少得很,而廟街關注組的朋友就落過不算太多次區,只約略讓廟街的小攤販知道這個內容。

在上次我們約見路政署的街坊會上,拋出的幾個諸如攤販的市集/夜市特色、聚落的形成等幾個說法,有區選候選人在區內攪了「參與式規劃的工作坊」 , 當然他們的起點就是以「中九線一定要建(社區設施一定要拆)」作前提。「齊來規劃」「共同落實」更加成為一系列公眾咨詢的招徠、口號,是公關手段還是規劃的進步,在現時仍然是未知之數。

這個關乎規劃的討論現時出現,孰危孰機,我們也難以判斷。

幾個月後的今天,路政署的研究亦拿著 「重組土地用途」、「加強本區特色」、「訂定用地大綱」、「優化社區」 等等用語,似乎指向著研究已是讓公眾討論土地用途,甚至關乎規劃。

一直以來廟街、政府合署郵局等等社區設施,對油麻地街坊與廟街,都似是社區不能分割的一部份;中九龍幹線以我們的理解也只不過是打通西九與東九龍之間的的管道,其實沒有非反對不可的道理(當然,反對為西九豪宅建私家路是我們反對現時中九的重點之一)。但中九最可恨的是,要殺掉社區的重要構成部份,並引伸著重建的危機,而在區內可造成的討論卻不熱烈-- 畢竟在政府的文件上,街坊可能連用家都算不上,而小攤販更是毫無被咨詢的權利。

所以,在這個公眾論壇上,我們希望有更多關注香港城市規劃的朋友,可以一同參與,一方面應對「顧問公司」的「預先設定」,另一方面也讓這油麻地的區內議題拉闊成關乎新舊區域融和與城市規劃的議題。

就是這樣了。謝謝你看到這裡。
如果你看完這郵件而希望對這議題有更多的關注,
請發電郵:templestreetconcern@yahoo.com.hk ,
或致電:阿偉9251 3132/旭雯2397 7231

留言 06 Nov, 07


November 2007
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

- 月的完缺

- 杳踏紛陳